6142-871-7808 / 61428717808

If you are looking for more information about the number 61428717808, you can read more feedback about it below by other visitors. You can make your own contribution if you want to and assist others in the process.
You can also use the voting system below to submit your vote quickly.

+ votes

- votes



Comments on 6142 871 7808 by other users

Leave a Comment
Currently, there are no reports on this phone number. If you would like to submit a comment about your experience, please use the form below.

Your Name:*

Your Comment:*

To prevent SPAM, please enter the words above

Note: Please do not spam

Details for 6142-871-7808

Votes for 61428717808

This website has a voting system that users can use to upvote or downvote a phone number.

If 6142 871 7808 has tried to get in touch with you and you are not happy with it, you can downvote. You can choose to downvote 6142 871 7808 for a variety of reasons from telemarketers calls, unsolicited calls, spam SMS message and robo calls.

Alternatively, if you know this number to be a legitimate number, you can upvote it and lets others know. This could include calls that you have requested and are expecting to receive.

Other Numbers

Other comments

didn't answer, no voicemail. CID showed it as coming from Wilkinsburg, PA. telcodata.us shows the 412-246-9000s block as belonging to Level 3 Communications. ... Read More
goes to court.

SCAM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!... Read More
who did nothing but scream and yell he was also threatening I would love to know who this individual is... Read More
answer it's nobody there...... Read More
Asking for me my husband said I was not in he asked who was calling and the man said go and fuck yourself you stupid Idiot, any Idea Who It... Read More
This number is being used to commit fraud. They send out an email supposedly from ebay giving this as the customer service phone number. It isn't ebay. It's fraudulent. They... Read More
call from this number left message stating they are with the better business bureau. Anyone verify this? ... Read More