0169-863-1912 / 01698631912

If you are looking for more information about the number 01698631912, you can read more feedback about it below by other visitors. You can make your own contribution if you want to and assist others in the process.

You can also use the voting system below to submit your vote quickly.

+ votes

- votes

18

0

Comments on 0169 863 1912 by other users

Leave a Comment
Comment by John
Wednesday, 01.27.2016 @ 09:45am
This is a company who is in England but somehow uses a local number, in my case 01698 XXXXXX. It is a company claiming to deal with PPI. When asked how he got my number he quoted the 'Ministry of Justice' and stated he was authorised to call me. I told him I would report him to OFTEL.

Your Name:*

Your Comment:*

To prevent SPAM, please enter the words above
 

Note: Please do not spam

Details for 0169-863-1912


No telecom information

Votes for 01698631912 / +44 169 863 1912


This website has a voting system that users can use to upvote or downvote a phone number.

If 0169 863 1912 has tried to get in touch with you and you are not happy with it, you can downvote. You can choose to downvote 0169 863 1912 for a variety of reasons from telemarketers calls, unsolicited calls, spam SMS message and robo calls.

Alternatively, if you know this number to be a legitimate number, you can upvote it and lets others know. This could include calls that you have requested and are expecting to receive.

Other Numbers

Other comments


5039804254
now.... Read More
02036511250
answer when I can. ... Read More
2026837996
or extension 315.... Read More
01613940344
Telemarketing from Lifestyle choices survey.... Read More
2482546057
up the number and found the exact service here. So am assuming it must be a scam. Watch out folks.... Read More
2034463301
scams to lower your electric bill... Read More
08452863404
door today with the cheque!!!
All I had to do was write them a £50 cheque in exchange

SCAM BE AWARE

... Read More
09088938486
call from this just a while ago. It's odd though, call was short. Bogus probably? ... Read More